At the Full Council meeting on Thursday 29th March, Council was asked to adopt Islington’s new Transport Strategy and Local Implementation Plan.
The plan, though somewhat overlong is by and large a worthwhile plan. It sets some quite demanding targets for increasing walking and cycling journeys, reducing traffic accidents, increasing bus reliability, managing local assets (roads etc) and reducing CO2 emissions.
There is however a problem with this last target. That of reducing CO2 emissions.
Here in Islington, and right across London, we suffer from a huge problem of airborne pollution. Our GP surgeries, clinics, and hospitals have to deal with an ever increasing amount of illnesses and conditions, both acute and ongoing. These illnesses, such as Asthma, Bronchitis, High Blood Pressure, and Heart attacks can all be attributed in no small measure to the prevalence of CO2 and particularly to minute particulates (PM2.5, and NO2 – a toxic gas), given off by petrol/diesel vehicles. Only smoking causes more early deaths than long-term exposure to air pollution and levels of NO2 are higher in London than any other capital city in Europe and comparable with Beijing.
Separate scientific research published by the Aphekom group of scientists in 2011 has shown that those living near roads travelled by 10,000 or more vehicles per day on average could be responsible for some 15-30 per cent of all new cases of asthma in children; and of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and CHD (coronary heart disease) in adults 65 years of age and older. There are 1,148 schools in London within 150 metres of roads carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day and a total of 2,270 within 400 metres of such roads. I challenge anyone to show me a Primary School in Islington that is not close to a very busy road.
And so, back to Islington’s new Transport Strategy.
The Tuesday immediately preceding the Full Council above, Islington’s Labour Executive voted through a proposal to create a raft of free short-stay parking bays. As residents can already park for free under the Roamer scheme, these free spaces are clearly aimed at passing-through business vehicles, the vast majority of which are diesel powered (by far the more polluting than petrol). We are told almost daily, by this Council, that it is these vehicles passing through the borough that are responsible for 90% of Islington’s airborne pollution and yet the Executive have just voted to increase these journeys in Islington.
I think you’ll agree that the policy makes no sense and the two policies/strategies, pull the borough in inexorably opposing directions.
How can Labour on the one hand say they are committed to reducing both short and long-term CO2 emissions and on the other increase the very vehicle journeys that cause 90% of our local airborne pollution issues? Labour’s 2010 election manifesto pledged
“Islington Labour environmental policies are on the side of residents by contributing to a
Greener, cleaner and fairer future for all.”
I don’t think increasing vehicle journeys and thus airborne pollution in our tightly packed mostly residential borough is in any way greener, cleaner, or fairer, nor does it contribute in any way to anyone’s positive future.
Article from Arthur Graves published in the Islington Tribune on Thursday 5th April 2012